The Invention of Russia

The Invention of Russia

From Gorbachev's Freedom to Putin's War

Book - 2015
Average Rating:
7
3
Rate this:
"A highly original narrative history by The Economist's Moscow bureau chief that does for modern Russia what Evan Osnos did for China in The Age of Ambition. The end of communism and breakup of the Soviet Union was a time of euphoria around the world, but Russia today is violently anti-American and dangerously nationalistic. So how did we go from the promise of those heady days to the autocratic police state of Putin's new Russia? The Invention of Russia is a breathtakingly ambitious book that reaches back to the darkest days of the Cold War to tell the story of the fight for the soul of a nation. With the deep insight only possible of a native son, Arkady Ostrovsky introduces us to the propagandists, oligarchs and fixers who have set Russia's course since the collapse of the Soviet Union, inventing a new and more ominous identity for a country where ideas are all too often wielded like a cudgel"--PRovided by publisher.
Published: New York :, Viking,, [2015]
ISBN: 9780399564178
0399564179
9780399564161
0399564160
Branch Call Number: 947.086 OST
Characteristics: 374 pages ;,24 cm

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Quotes

Add a Quote

r
roystreet
Aug 18, 2016

In contrast to Yeltsin, who. . .saw Russia as a nation, Putin saw it first and foremost as a state -- and himself as its guardian.
Russia would never become a second edition of Britain or America, where liberal values had deep traditions. Russian had its own core values. These were patriotism, collectivism, "derzhavnost" -- tradition of being a great geopolitical state power that commands the attention of other countries -- and "gosudarstvennichestvo," the primacy of the state.

"For Russians, a strong state is . . .the source and guarantor of order, the initiator and the main driving force of any change."

r
roystreet
Aug 16, 2016

The idea ofAmerica as a utopia, literally a no-place, a dream, had long been ingrained in Russian culture. . . For much of the 1990s, America had served as a model, an inspiration and an anchor. The 1998 crisis showed the futility of this dream. The bombing of Serbia crashed the dream itself. The West ceased to be an anchor. . .Russia was on its own. America turned into a scapegoat for all the troubles that the Russian people had experienced over the previous decade.

r
roystreet
Aug 16, 2016

The biggest event of Primakov's short term in office was the bombing of Yugoslavia by NATO forces. On March 23, 1999 -- the eve of the NATO strikes -- Primakov was in the air, on his way to Washington to negotiate financial aid for Russia, when he learned that the airstrike on Belgrade was imminent. In a powerful gesture, loaded with symbolism, Primakov ordered his plane to turn around over the Atlantic and fly back to Moscow. . . .
Primakov's U-turn was not just an expression of the government's frustration with America's policy toward Serbia and its disregard for Russia's opposition to airstrikes. It captured something far more significant -- a general change in attitude toward America and the West among the Russian general pubic. . . .

r
roystreet
Aug 16, 2016

How could this unremarkable man [Putin] with no charisma, unmemorable features and weak voice be seriously seen as a successor to Yeltsin?

But it was precisely the contrast with Yeltsin that made Putin "sellable" to the Russian public. The popular support for Yeltsin, boosted by the threat of the Communist victory in 1996, had started to decline as soon s that threat was removed and had been completely undermined by the 1998 crisis [collapse of the Russian ruble]. Nearly half of the country felt that Yeltsin's years in power had brought nothing good to the country; what they had brought was economic crisis, inflation and the collapse of theSoviet Union. Only a quarter of Russians credited him with freedoms and democracy. The majority wanted him to go.

r
roystreet
Aug 01, 2016

The early 1990s was a wild and entrepreneurial time, when anything seemed possible. The state was weak and private initiative strong. It was, perhaps, the freest time in Russian history. As Vladimir Yakovlev said, "We were like kids in a kindergarten with real machine guns."

r
roystreet
Aug 01, 2016

The end of the Soviet Union produced none of the cultural vitality that had accompanied its birth in 1917. . . .Lacking a new project or even a vision of the future, Russia searched for a mythical past.

r
roystreet
Aug 01, 2016

"Kommersant" [1991] fought against Soviet ideology, but its own rejection of Soviet culture -- dissident or official -- was deeply ideological. Anything that was touched by Soviet aesthetics was out, regardless of its content or artistic merit. . .they threw out an entire layer of culture that contained among other things, strong antidotes to nationalism and totalitarianism. By doing so, they severely damaged the country's immunity to these viruses, making it easier, a decade later, to restore the symbols of Soviet statehood.

Comment

Add a Comment

d
dlapins
Apr 28, 2017

This is an excellent read. It shows how Russian politicians can be swayed in their political thinking by the media and power brokers. There are also interesting parallels between Putin and Trump and how they both want control of the media.

m
michaelfwood
Aug 17, 2016

Superb revelation of how politicos is Russia use the media to shape public opinion.

r
roystreet
Aug 01, 2016

One he** of a read; showing how history is shaped as much by what goes on inside our minds as by events on the ground..

Age

Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number Find Series Titles and Similar Books With Novelist

Recommendations

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at DBRL

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top